ISSN(Print):   2664-0422 - ISSN(Online):   2664-0430 - ISSN-L:   2664-0422
PSSR Logo

PAKISTAN SOCIAL SCIENCES REVIEW (PSSR)

 An Open access,Open Archive, Double-Blinded Peer Review, Multidisciplinary Journal
Recognition by HEC in Y category
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Corrigendum
    • Galley Proof
  • Policies
    • Ethical Statement
    • Publication Policy
    • Archiving Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Open Access Policy
    • Licensing & Copyright
  • Guidelines
    • Author Guidelines
    • Plagiarism Guidelines
    • Call for Papers
    • Publication Fee
    • Article Processing Chart
    • Sample Paper
  • About
    • Scope & Mission
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Editorial Team & Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact Us
    • Complain / Feedback
  • Submit to OJS
News
  • Only through proper channel submitted articles via Open Journal System (OJS) will be entertained.
  • Bimonthly Published
  • Recognition by Govt of Pakistan (HEC) in Y category.

How to Cite

Max Webber’s Legitimacy and Iranian Political System after Islamic Revolution 1979

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the concept of Max Weber regarding Legitimacy in prospect of traditional, Charismatic and Legal-Rational in relation to Ayatollah Khomeini who was the founder of Iranian Islamic Revolution 1979. This study tries to explore the returning to Weber can elucidate several facts about the legitimacy. By this paper tried to show that how much similarity of political system of Iran to the western context (Weberian) with demarcations of power. The system is unique as its roots of its legitimacy are traditional, charismatic and rational-legalistic. Today, Iranian political structure was developed by the teachings and models of Imam Khomeini which consists on the combination of Islamic theocracy and with bits of democracy on the thoughts of Max Weber. Max Weber considers the importance of strong legitimacy for political order’s constancy. The concept of Max Weber about legal legitimacy relating to democratic legitimation chucks the new light on the theoretical legitimacy discrepancy in transnational power that sorts it to look less histrionic. Historic, investigative and qualitative methods are used in this paper

Authors

  • Dr. Rizwana Kausar
  • PhD in Political Science, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Umm-E Rubab
  • MS International Relations, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Rubina Bibi
  • M. Phil. in Political Science, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan

Keywords

Second Language Learning, Alternative Conceptions, Interference Of Mother Language, Traditional Methodology

DOI Number

10.35484/pssr.2020(4-I)49

DOI Link

http://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2020(4-I)49

Page Nos

627-640

Volume & Issue

v4-1

Citation Formats

ABNT   APA   BibTex   MLA   Oxford   Harvard   Chicago   Turabian   AAA   MHRA  
WhatsApp
+92 306 3333475
  • Article Submission: editor@pssr.org.pk
  • Article Submission: editor.pssr@gmail.com
  • Assistant Contact: +92 306 3333475
  • Address: RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS). 78-FF Commercial Street 323 Wafi Citi, Citi Housing Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan
Creative Commons License
Pakistan Social Sciences Review (PSSR) by RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://pssr.org.pk/

Pakistan Social Sciences Review (PSSR), Developed by M. Yaseen

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Corrigendum
    • Galley Proof
  • Policies
    • Ethical Statement
    • Publication Policy
    • Archiving Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Open Access Policy
    • Licensing & Copyright
  • Guidelines
    • Author Guidelines
    • Plagiarism Guidelines
    • Call for Papers
    • Publication Fee
    • Article Processing Chart
    • Sample Paper
  • About Us
    • Scope & Mission
    • Editorial Team & Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact Us
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Complain / Feedback
  • Submit to OJS