ISSN(Print):   2664-0422 - ISSN(Online):   2664-0430 - ISSN-L:   2664-0422
PSSR Logo

PAKISTAN SOCIAL SCIENCES REVIEW (PSSR)

 An Open access,Open Archive, Double-Blinded Peer Review, Multidisciplinary Journal
Recognition by HEC in Y category
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Corrigendum
    • Galley Proof
  • Policies
    • Ethical Statement
    • Publication Policy
    • Archiving Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Open Access Policy
    • Licensing & Copyright
  • Guidelines
    • Author Guidelines
    • Plagiarism Guidelines
    • Call for Papers
    • Publication Fee
    • Article Processing Chart
    • Sample Paper
  • About
    • Scope & Mission
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Editorial Team & Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact Us
    • Complain / Feedback
  • Submit to OJS
News
  • Only through proper channel submitted articles via Open Journal System (OJS) will be entertained.
  • Bimonthly Published
  • Recognition by Govt of Pakistan (HEC) in Y category.

How to Cite

Development of Students’ Learning Outcomes Based Standardized Achievement Test of Mathematics

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to promote a research on standardization of tests items for testing learning outcome in the subject of Mathematics at secondary level. An item bank consisting of 140 dichotomous items was developed using modern test theory-Item Response Theory (IRT). Each item was aligned, on the basis of Blooms’ taxonomy, with a unique students’ learning outcome SLO of National Curriculum for 9th Grade Mathematics. Three Item’s booklets were piloted over 960 students from four strata male, Female, rural and urban. Pilot data was analyzed using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) based software and sixty items were selected for final test based on item difficulty and discrimination indexes. Total 320 students were participated from 09 districts of the Punjab and four strata—male, Female, rural and urban. Data was analyzed by using SPSS, Conquest, and Multilog software. IRT based person item map showed the test item covered -3 to +3 range of abilities. Test characteristics and item characteristics curves and factor analysis supported the reliability and validity of the test. It explored that Math achievement test is appropriately constructed. One may replicate this study by using 2PLM and 3PLM of Item Response Theory (IRT) models.

Authors

  • Muhammad Jafar Ali
  • PhD Scholar, Department of Education, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Abdul Hameed
  • Professor, Department of Education, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

Keywords

Standardized, Mathematics, Achievement test, Learning Outcomes, Classical Test Theory (CTT), Item Response Theory (IRT), Rash Model

DOI Number

10.35484/pssr.2020(4-I)31

DOI Link

http://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2020(4-I)31

Page Nos

389-402

Volume & Issue

v4-1

Citation Formats

ABNT   APA   BibTex   MLA   Oxford   Harvard   Chicago   Turabian   AAA   MHRA  
WhatsApp
+92 306 3333475
  • Article Submission: editor@pssr.org.pk
  • Article Submission: editor.pssr@gmail.com
  • Assistant Contact: +92 306 3333475
  • Address: RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS). 78-FF Commercial Street 323 Wafi Citi, Citi Housing Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan
Creative Commons License
Pakistan Social Sciences Review (PSSR) by RESEARCH OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED(ROSS) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://pssr.org.pk/

Pakistan Social Sciences Review (PSSR), Developed by M. Yaseen

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Corrigendum
    • Galley Proof
  • Policies
    • Ethical Statement
    • Publication Policy
    • Archiving Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Open Access Policy
    • Licensing & Copyright
  • Guidelines
    • Author Guidelines
    • Plagiarism Guidelines
    • Call for Papers
    • Publication Fee
    • Article Processing Chart
    • Sample Paper
  • About Us
    • Scope & Mission
    • Editorial Team & Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Contact Us
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Complain / Feedback
  • Submit to OJS